<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great photography isn’t always about technique.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographycourses.biz/blog/2008/07/great-photography-isn%e2%80%99t-always-about-technique/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographycourses.biz/blog/2008/07/great-photography-isn%e2%80%99t-always-about-technique/</link>
	<description>This blog is for photography news, views, tips and updates to complement our photography training courses</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Browne</title>
		<link>http://photographycourses.biz/blog/2008/07/great-photography-isn%e2%80%99t-always-about-technique/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographycourses.biz/blog/?p=11#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin

Sounds like the highlight warnings were switched on when you viewed the picture in the back of the camera. You've got one area very bright (sky) and the other very dark (presume 'Rottie' is a dog), the camera chose to go for an exposure close to the Rottie's dark tones which made the sky 'burn out' and go white.

When you viewed it on the back, the flashing highlight warnings in the sky were telling you 'this area is so bright there's no detail here at all.' But that's OK because you were taking a pic of the Rottie - not the sky.

Hope this helps...

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin</p>
<p>Sounds like the highlight warnings were switched on when you viewed the picture in the back of the camera. You&#8217;ve got one area very bright (sky) and the other very dark (presume &#8216;Rottie&#8217; is a dog), the camera chose to go for an exposure close to the Rottie&#8217;s dark tones which made the sky &#8216;burn out&#8217; and go white.</p>
<p>When you viewed it on the back, the flashing highlight warnings in the sky were telling you &#8216;this area is so bright there&#8217;s no detail here at all.&#8217; But that&#8217;s OK because you were taking a pic of the Rottie - not the sky.</p>
<p>Hope this helps&#8230;</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin colville</title>
		<link>http://photographycourses.biz/blog/2008/07/great-photography-isn%e2%80%99t-always-about-technique/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin colville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographycourses.biz/blog/?p=11#comment-14</guid>
		<description>i have a nikon d40x and with tye built in flash took a picture of my pet rottie the background was bright when i looked at the picture on my camera the white background seemed to flash, although when printed pictur came out reasonable
what would this be 

kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a nikon d40x and with tye built in flash took a picture of my pet rottie the background was bright when i looked at the picture on my camera the white background seemed to flash, although when printed pictur came out reasonable<br />
what would this be </p>
<p>kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
